In the lectures I quoted, without proof, the results

MATH

and

MATH

which are good for low enough values of $T$. Here is the derivation (and I only recommend the following for those who are particularly good at maths).

To get the chemical potential we use

MATH

with MATH and to get the internal energy we have a similar integral, just an extra factor of $\varepsilon $ in the numerator.

Therefore we have to perform integrals of the type

MATH

where MATH for $N$ and MATH for $U$.

It must be possible to write

MATH

You can see that this must be possible because at $T=0$ the denominator of the integrand is equal to unity for MATHand infinite for $\varepsilon >\mu .$ Let's try and manipulate our integral into this form.

Put MATH. Then we have

MATH

Now use a neat trick and write

MATH

This leads to

MATH

Now we notice that the middle of these three integrals has an upper limit which we can safely set to infinity. You can see this because as MATH the integrand is approximately equal to $f(-kTz)e^{-z}$. Since $f(-kTz)$ is only powerlike in $z$, it follows that the contribution to the integral from the large $z$ region is suppressed exponentially, i.e. by a factor MATH. Such a term will be smaller than any power of $T$ as $T\rightarrow 0$. Therefore we can safely write

MATH

We have succeeded in manipulating the integral into a useful form. The first term is the term we calculated in the lectures whilst the second term can be expanded in a Taylor series about $T=0$, i.e.

MATH

The integral over $z$ gives

MATH

We can now go ahead and determine the chemical potential and the internal energy.




For the chemical potential

MATH

and for the internal energy

MATH